§ Evidence Sensitivity Explorer
Which evidence combinations actually win?
Payers have structured intelligence about what to deny. This tool shows you the other side: which evidence layers move outcomes, for which payer, and by how much.
Step 1 of 3
Step 1 · Your Denial Context
Tell us about your denial landscape
Primary payer
United
Anthem
Cigna
BCBS
Molina
Other
Primary level of care
PHP
IOP
SUD Residential
Outpatient BH
Monthly denied BH claims
50
Average denied claim value
$8,000
BH medical necessity denials run 2–4× higher than general medical. The evidence that wins varies dramatically by payer — same diagnosis, different outcome based on how you package it.
Step 2 · Your Current Evidence Package
What do you include in appeal packages today?
Estimated Overturn Rate
0%
Select your evidence layers
Achievable with full package: 92%
Your Evidence Sensitivity Report
Based on your payer + level of care + your current evidence package.
■ Evidence Sensitivity Curve
0%
Your Current Rate
0%
Achievable Rate
+0pp
Evidence Gap
■ Payer-Specific Insight
■ Recovery Projection
Currently Recovering
$0
per month
With Full Evidence Package
$0
per month
Annual Revenue Gap
$0
recoverable with better evidence
Per-Claim Improvement
$0
additional recovery per denied claim
This is what Stratum builds. Precedent intelligence, payer by payer.
We structure the evidence combinations that actually win — and make them reusable across your entire team.
Directional estimates based on AHA 2024, Counterforce Health / JBHSR, Virginia Bureau of Insurance Parity Report (2025, 44.5M claims), and internal cross-validation. Actual overturn rates vary by payer, LOC, denial type, and clinical scenario. Not a guarantee of outcomes. © 2026 Stratum Collective.