Case law for claims.
Most vendors optimize throughput. We optimize precedent.
Precedent-based denial intelligence for behavioral health. We capture what actually wins — and make it permanent.
“The asymmetry isn’t clinical — it’s informational.”
Payers already reason from precedent — they just hope you don’t too.
p. 03 — Why this category exists
Three ways to handle a complex denial. Only one of them scales.
AI RCM automation
Optimizes throughput on the easy 70 percent.
- Templated appeal letters
- Drifts in weeks when payer policy changes
- You do not own the model or the corpus
Manual billers
Hold the institutional knowledge in their heads.
- Reasoning is durable while they stay
- Cannot be searched, audited, or transferred
- One departure resets the team to zero
Stratum
Structures the precedent layer your team is already building.
- Searchable corpus of payer-denial precedents
- Updates with each appeal cycle
- You own the structured asset
Every AI RCM vendor optimizes the easy 70 percent. We operate on the complex 30 percent — where payer enforcement varies, models drift in weeks, and the answer can’t be templated.
See what your denials are hiding.
We start with your data and show you exactly where precedent intelligence recovers revenue.